zzzak

You know Bucky, I like that Putin can talk for half an hour about Russian history from the 9th Century without notes and that Trump can address a crowd of over 20,000 people for two hours again without notes which shows them to have superior intellects, then on the other hand we have Joe sniffing children and unable to find his way off a stage so who would you put in charge of the nukes, for you, if you look outside Rishi is taking a dump on your doorstep and Macron is already at the nightclub, better get your glad rags on or you'll miss all the fun. https://www.bitchute.com/video/1BDDOTE9zOnw/

I took notice of what you said and went to the NASA site and it is indeed Aldrin in that photo so there, I've learnt something albeit minor, while I was on the NASA site I came across a picture of the lander in all it's glory and seriously they must be kidding, its made out of shit left over from a hardware shop sale, further on the photos celluloid film used to get damaged in the airports under a low level radiation scan so how did they get all those rolls of film back throught the Van Allen belts, no way Jose.

And Trump.

Sorry, I wasn't referring to you losing your rag, you're the only one that didn't, that remark was for the others.

For you to go on a rideout against my KTM you would need to leave a week earlier.

Just disassembled my calipers and am hoping to pop the pistons out soon, depends on when the computer shop is open, he has a compressor, small town stuff.

As I have said afaic the Earth is an oblate sphere, I'm not questioning that but was merely interested in the two items that I posted seeking a rational explanation, this apparently was to much for some of the forum members as you have seen. Shadows don't turn corners. If you know anything about photography in the late 60's you will know that celluloid film stock is very heat sensitive so none of those miraculous images would have come out, in the shade the film would have shattered as it was advanced and when exposed to the heat it would have lost the ability to capture an image, Armstrong had the camera strapped to his chest without a viewfinder and he would have had to make the exposure adjustments while wearing heavy gloves, not happening, but by a miracle every photo came out perfectly, but the big thing from all the alleged missions is where are the photos of the Earth, there aren't any, not a one, did they not look up or something, the "Blue Marble' image is an illustration done by a guy working for NASA, he even admits it, so there was only one camera on the Apollo 11 mission so who took this, where was the camera mounted ?

My sides, my sides.

One owner.

Is that the best that you can come up with ? As you seem to think that you're an intellectual can you tell me what's wrong with this photo ?

You might have been to successful in your search.

OK, get your torch out and get shadows at 90 degrees to each other, by the way the shadows are not the main arguments as there are so many other things that don't add up, such as where's the dust on the landers pads, surely a rocket engine would have blown a bit of moondust around.

You're not fooling me mate.

So you call me an idiot for asking a question and then answer the question, that says a lot about you.

Thank you for a sensible answer to the questions that I posed, as I said I was merely wondering and seeking further information. As to the rest of the posts at no stage have I ever said that the Earth was flat, in fact I don't think that it is but was merely curious about the two things that I posted, the only person here who has mentioned a flat Earth has been Bucky so keep that in mind before you lose your rag in future. One last question, Pete, where the fuck did you get this lot from, off a short bus from a special school or something ?

There's this as well, if the Sun is 93 million miles away how come the rays spread out like this ? You know, it looks like Bucky could be right.

Bucky mentioned it a few times but I paid him no heed because I only look for things that are valid and Buckys constant references to it were enough to make me ignore it, however as a conspiracy theorist I always keep looking for clues and I found this. Now as to the Earth being flat I am neither for or against it but given what we have been told I found this to be an interesting observation.

Found the tracks.

It's a good thing that she has a job.