-
Posts
507 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Cupid Stunt last won the day on September 19 2021
Cupid Stunt had the most liked content!
Reputation
1,871 ExcellentPersonal Information
-
Location
Swansea
-
Motorcycle
Yamaha X-Max 400
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
You forgot to add "darlings" on the end of that you raving queen
-
That's the Arena Swansea and the new footbridge that replaced the old one, looks fekin shite, people call it the "Toblerone Bridge" https://maps.app.goo.gl/BYJWisgasKgpqyUQ7
-
-
Nature Quest - Share Your Best Nature Photographs
Cupid Stunt replied to Grasshopper's topic in GALLERY
- 808 replies
-
- 4
-
- nature
- photography
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
The tasteful artwork on the fourth plinth, Trafalgar Square of Baptist preacher John Chilembwe and European missionary John Chorley is being replaced with this progressive piece of shitecrapgarbage
-
Easy it's the dick who posted it
-
Yes and I bet you've also asked why the cows in the field are so small
-
I found another obvious conspiracy for Zzak - Trains are fake!
Cupid Stunt replied to Cupid Stunt's topic in GENERAL CHAT
-
Yes, I discovered that trains are actually fake. I know this as I was out walking and came across some old disused train track, when I looked down the tracks they clearly were much smaller further way and far too close together for a train to run on, clearly proving that trains cannot really exists and run on tracks.
-
Having said all that, the only think you can know for sure is that you exist "I think therefore I am" as any and all sensory perceptions are just thoughts
-
Fuck me, how dumb can people be? This in fact proves that either the Sun is tiny and close to us or massive and a long way away, if the Sun is massive and close to us the Sun rays would be closer to being parallel, if it was smaller and close to use the rays would fan out (but then you'd struggle to feel any warmth from a small Sun and it would not illuminate virtually 50% of the Earth at any one point in time), so that leaves huge and far from us give a similar appearance of size but much more powerful, illuminating nearly half the planet and having rays that spread out due to the angle of penetration of the rays of light
-
Oh and forget his claptrap about the Sun moving through the Universe, it's literally not relevant. the stars you see in the sky are in our own Galaxy, the Galaxy moves relative to the Earth or rather the Earth moves with the Galaxy and all it's stars, the Earth does not move through the Galaxy at any astronomica significant spped, it orbits the centre of the galaxy at 230km per second but then the entire galaxy is rotating with it DUH!. so yes everything appears static although over decades slight movements can be detected. Things far away appear to be motionless but the fact is they are moving at incredible speeds, it's another failing of flat Earthers (Flerfs) to underestimate the size of our Solar system let alone the Milky Way Galaxy and beyond, just a tiny snippet to give some kind of persepctive... If you jumped on your bike and rode to Jupiter non stop at 60mph, how long would it take you to get there, no break/stop/sleeping? 700 years is the answer and our system isn't even a spec of dust compared to the Galaxy we're in, if our Sun was the size of a ping pong ball the next nearest star to it (Proxima Centuri) would be 680 miles away
-
Fucking idiot, Polaris isn't fixed, even polar scopes of fairly recent manufacture have to be taken with a pinch of salt when using the built in marks for where to place Polaris to gain accurate polar alignment with the Earth's axis of rotation Here's an example of Losmandy brand polarscope reticule, you can see the markings (near where it say's UMi (Polaris), that is where Polaris has to be placed and it changes, it is now out of the markins so alignment can be too far off for accurate tracking of more than 30 sec with a 1000mm telescope, it why we use plate solving to give absolute accuracy for better tracking (plate solving is uploading and image to servers that identify precisely where your telescope is pointed by analysing the stars in the image) it takes two separate images to be plate solved by rotating the mount on it's RA (right ascension) axis the program then gives a visual as to which way to move the elevation and azimuth controls to get it spot on, taking more images each time and plate solving after each move. These fuckwits really ought to do their homework properly as the people who listen to them should.
-
Ah, must have ridden right by it, looks like it's still there on Google Street View