zzzak

Found the one that I was looking for, that earlier one is a really shitty photo, however I did save this one.

There is only one light source on the Moon, you may have heard of it, its called the Sun, sunlight can only cast shadows in one direction, there's no arguing that, so why are there shadows going is two directions, simple question, the answer is that there was more than one light source, as there was only one on the Moon that means that the photos were taken in a studio, any questions ?

They must be around there somewhere, this is mans greatest moment, the first time to walk on the Moon but they lost all the data, it gets better, Scrap dealer finds Apollo-era NASA computers in dead engineer’s basement, So they found 325 Apollo era tapes and then they said, “There is no evidence that suggests this material is historically significant... I recommend disposal through the immediate destruction of all magnetic tapes.” Immediate destruction, what are they hiding, I think that I know, what I don;'t know is why all of you are so outraged about my questioning it, there are hundreds of things that point to a hoax but you refuse to see them, why ?

This is me on the left asking about tyre tracks and that is you on the right avoiding a simple question.

Still haven't answered on the lack of tyre marks and how come the astronaut got in front of the cross, it should have been in front of him surely, by the way I like that you support Trump, any mention of him is support because it brings his name to the fore and I'm not talking about golf, there's another oddity, when the astronaut hit the golf ball someone at Houston commented on its slice, you can't slice a ball where there is no atmosphere, same with flags, no air means no flutter.

Fixed.

Maybe the astronaut wouldn't cook, as nobody has ever been there we'll never know for sure so lets move on to the many anomalies such as where are the tracks from the Rover, the footprints are quite obvious so how did the Rover get to where it was photographed, that's a fair question, also how about these two ? A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16’s Lunar Lander lifting off the Moon. Who did the filming? The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it’s never been fired… Those are just two of many unanswered questions, lets start with who panned the camera during liftoff, that should be an easy one to answer.

Still reading it eh ?

Here's a good one, the alleged mass shooting event in New Zealand, someone posted the story a day early but it got screenshotted. From Wikipedia; The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive mass shootings on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on 15 March 2019. Another hoax, they said that you could get 13 years jail for watching or sharing the video of the event, having seen it I know why, it was like the Three Stooges make a movie, a guy in a car shoots a rifle through the windscreen but it doesn't leave a hole, he drives a car over a body lying in the street but it doesn't rise up to go over it, just goes straight and level. The nearest police station was a mile away but it took them 17 minutes to respond, no ambulances turned up, just another gun grabbing hoax. My favorite is the dead guy texting.

Moving it wouldn't make any difference, you would still read it no matter where it was.

Hey Perdo, that's not very nice, after all there's fuck all else happening around here at the moment, maybe you should move to Spain or something.

Remember when I said that these guys are as thick as mince, at the time I was joking however...

Here's a good one, given that the are plenty of footprints where are the tracks from the Rover, how did it get there, lowered from a crane is my best guess. Even better is this one, how does a 6800ft/lb thrust rocket fail to disturb the lunar surface ?

I don’t like leg of lamb cooked too rare. I think it tastes better more on the medium well side, so I go closer to the two hour mark and aim for an internal temperature of about 135F. Rest, Then Blast with High Heat for 5 Minutes Let the lamb rest at room temperature for 30 minutes, then place it in a 500F oven for 5 minutes.

Can you see Apollo landing sites with a telescope? As you're well aware, no telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings. The laws of optics define its limits.22 Apr 2015 So your full of it, don't you check your research ? At its height, Nasa estimates that a total of 400,000 men and women across the United States were involved in the Apollo programme. The number includes everyone from astronauts to mission controllers, contractors to caterers, engineers, scientists, nurses, doctors, mathematicians and programmers. So what would a caterer know, or a nurse, a very small group of people convinced America to invade Viet Nam based on a lie about an attack in the Gulf of Tonkin, everybody else just went along with what they were told and we saw what happened there. Did you know that the word cat upside down spells gullible ?

You can land a spacecraft on the Moon but you can't land people on the Moon, is that to hard for you to understand, daytime temperatures near the lunar equator reach a boiling 250 degrees Fahrenheit (120° C, 400 K), while nighttime temperatures get to a chilly -208 degrees Fahrenheit (-130° C, 140 K). There is no atmosphere to provide any protection from the Suns rays, if I put a leg of lamb in a 250f oven its cooked in about 3 hours so any astronauts would be well done after 21 hours, there are many many more anomolies such as who adjusted the camera when the lander took off, did they have a special camera or something ? Gullible you say, I know who the gullible one is.