Being 'objective' doesn't enter into it - it's a straightforward distinction between understanding the physics of radioactive decay and not understanding the physics of radioactive decay.
Furthermore, I would argue that there is no comparison to be made between us when it comes to our objectivity. I couldn't care less whether radiometric dating 'works' or not, any more than I could care less whether evolution 'works' or not: I don't believe in them because I need to, but because the evidence for both is overwhelming. You, on the other hand, have a very strong vested interest in discrediting them because they fatally undermine Young Earth Creationism. Now whatever my personal views on wider religious belief may be, they pale into insignificance compared to the shear, thoroughgoing asininity of the corner of it that you have chosen to inhabit. For the low price of the complete surrender of your critical faculties you have elected to take refuge in a world of idiotic bliss, clinging to infantile views that other creationists regard as embarrassing fringe lunacy that is so easily debunked that it undermines the whole credibility of the Christian message.
I have said before that it is perfectly possible to have Christian faith without needing to resort to this sort of rank idiocy. Perhaps it is time you put away childish things.