All Activity

It's no bullshit Saul...stock form..it produces around 105 hp...even thoe what ive done so far maybe added another 5 hp maybe slightly more...that's about it...but has soon has these dam tarrif ends...I'll be sending the ecu for a proper tune...

That dyno chart is just an exhaust swap numbskull!

Well ok maybe not 10 k...lol...what's the cost of cams decent exaust, and air cleaner and a tune then ?

Your bike tops out at 180 mph ? My 1290 topped out at 160mph and it was no where's aerodynamic built like your bike.. Has for a cruiser, from experience having owned 2 previous harleys the indian is night and day in comparison...sure its no hyper sport bike but can actually be pushed at a fairly descent pace at time...

Marcel is using his own measure. For him it's Bullshite Horse Power normally found on paper which I believe is a smaller unit than measured Brake Horse Power.

That helmet will bake your head.

Anyway you have just swapped the air cleaner and mufflers, no tune. Probably not even pulling 100hp. No wonder it is slower than Dans bike.

Exhaust pipe does not cost $10k

Ah stop bitching before I lay down another smack down hotel on your candy arse...

I prefer real speed..... aka mph..... none of this continental shite work in imperial not metric. I wouldn't have an issue riding a crosser it's just cruisers I refuse to ever throw a leg over again they are horrible to ride and don't handle how a bike should handle

I had a top box. Well made a lasted me a good few years before I sold it on for bigger kit. Sold it to the shop apprentice if I remember right.

Looks like pilot error...high side it maybe...

Here @Buckster let me educate you..in comparison a new Harley 117 isn't even producing 100 hp...92 to 94 hp at the top end ..to get it over the 100 hp club ..you need to.pump.like 10 g in to it...

By the way, you cannot say someone is wrong when they are asking a question numbskull!

So just the handling limitation of Indian motorcycles, okay.

Suppose to go out today with the Harley crew...expecting slow speed and coffee drinking to keep awake...the norm...

Wrong again ...much to learn you still have...

On the other hand ...your tractor on a dyno you'd be lucky if you pulled 65 hp and and maybe 80 fp of torque in comparison...and at 80 ft pound I'm being generous here...

Much to learn my little patawan..lol.

Metzeler?

You have about 105 hp and 110 lbs ft of torque. It’s all in your head.

It's actually my first tool box after coming out of the community college after taking the automotive course...in 1984 or 85 maybe ...

Seriously Buck , avon's is a budget tire , and it would melt on the rear of this challenger with the amount of torque it produces ...ive tried Michelin , dunlop , Bridgestone, like I said , the commander 3 didn't hear anything good on the wet traction part from reliable sources....not saying its a bad tire...these cruisetec i have ran for 30 thousand km and never at any time felt they were skidish on wet tarmac...they are rated for 17000 thousand miles...and if I wasn't so abusive in the way I ride they would definitely last that long...I ride at times with the traction control turned off and im not gental when leaving from a dead stop...they corner real well also...and is and excellent tire in my opinion...

Seems to be the future in the old country but it ain't for me , it's either 4 stroke or 2 stroke, ....sod the no stroke

1 of the smarter things I ever did was quit smoking... got real tired of paying good money just kill myself...ridiculously Stoopid! But tbh, still burn a little bit of cannabis about 3 times a YEAR....usually when I'm camping.